United States v. M. H. Bigan
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
This controversy is of federal cognizance because it is a suit by the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 1345. The wrong-alleged is the obstruction of a navigable-stream in violation of Sections 10 and 13 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 U.S. C.A. §§ 403, 407. The government also-contends, though we do not find it necessary to decide, that, apart from the statute, the physical obstruction of commerce-is an actionable civil wrong. The relief sought is a mandatory injunction requiring the removal of the obstruction in question, as said to be authorized by Section 12 of the Rivers…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State of Penn. v. THE WHEELING &C. BRIDGE CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Sanitary District of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Siegel v. Association of Bar of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Clark v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WEST INDIES TRANSPORT, INC.; WIT EQUIPMENT CO., INC.; And W. JAMES OELSNER, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. EME Homer City Generation, L.PCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Orange Beach Water, Sewer & Fire Protection Authority v. M/V AlvaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.