Legal Opinion

Whited v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1993No. CR-91-919Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON RETURN TO REMAND

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Billie Nelson Whited, appealed the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. We remanded this cause so that the trial court could hold an evidentiary hearing on the appellant’s allegations and make “specific findings of fact relating to each material issue of fact presented.” Rule 32.9(d), A.R.Crim.P. Whited v. State, 623 So.2d 352 (Ala.Cr.App.1992). After the trial court’s return, we found it necessary to again remand the cause to the trial court because the trial court failed to comply with our directions.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whited v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Whited v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API