Legal Opinion

Whited v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 22, 1993No. CR-91-919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON RETURN TO REMAND

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Billie Nelson Whited, appealed the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. *354We remanded this cause so that the trial court could hold an evidentiary hearing on the appellant’s allegations and make “specific findings of fact relating to each material issue of fact presented.” Rule 32.9(d), A.R.Crim.P. Whited v. State, 623 So.2d 352 (Ala.Cr.App.1992). We find it necessary to again remand this cause because the trial court failed to comply with our directions.

The trial court, in ruling on the petition, stated:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whited v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Whited v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API