Legal Opinion

Sheppard v. Nienow

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 26, 1970No. 19031PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Chief Justice.

Shannon Sheppard, an infant three years of age, by her mother Lucy B. Sheppard, as guardian ad litem, the respondent herein, instituted this action against Art Nienow and Nienow Plaza, Inc., the appellants herein, to recover damages for personal injury sustained on or about June 15, 1967, by reason of the alleged negligence and willfulness of the appellants. The injury was sustained on premises in the exclusive possesion and control of Lucy B. Sheppard who was a tenant and had rented a trailer belonging to Art Nienow and a trailer lot owned by Nienow Plaza, Inc., such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Williams Wood Products Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  2. Conner v. Farmers and Merchants BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. Pendarvis v. WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carlein Hatfield, a Minor Over the Age of Fourteen (14) by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Norma B. Hatfield v. Sophia Beleos PallesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  2. Young Ex Rel. Estate of Young v. MorriseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Edwards, Inc. v. Arlen Realty & Development Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1978
  4. Williams Ex Rel. Estate of Williams v. RegulaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  5. Williams v. RileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API