Legal Opinion

Deardorff v. Continental Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1929No. Appeal, 114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

In this case, suit was instituted on an insurance policy, an affidavit of defense raising questions of law was filed, the court below decided against defendant, “with leave to file a supplemental affidavit of defense to the averments of fact,” and this appeal followed. In Stamper v. Kogelschatz, 289 Pa. 94, 95, we decided that an order such as here appealed from was interlocutory and no appeal could be taken therefrom.

The appeal is quashed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stamper v. KogelschatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Creighan v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Hamilton v. Police Beneficiary Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Hair v. FerenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Herman v. World Fire & Marine InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936