Legal Opinion
Estate of Gold v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 12, 1987No. LUBA No. 86-102, CA A44142Published
1Opinion of the Court
740 P.2d 812 (1987)
87 Or.App. 45
ESTATE OF Paul GOLD, Josephine Cohen, Hannah Davis, Ethel Gold and Jack Gold, Petitioners,
v.
CITY OF PORTLAND, Respondent.
LUBA No. 86-102, CA A44142.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted June 15, 1987.
Decided August 12, 1987.
Reconsideration Denied October 9, 1987.
Diane Spies, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the brief was Diane Spies & Associates, P.C., Portland.
Jeannette M. Launer, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Kathryn Beaumont Imperati, Chief Deputy City Attorney, Portland.
Before…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Petersen v. MAYOR ETC. CITY OF KLAMATH FALLSOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Western Amusement Co., Inc. v. City of SpringfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.