Legal Opinion

Watts v. Mohr

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1948No. Civ. 16196PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendant Anna Mohr from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs decreeing specific performance of an escrow agreement.

On October 5, 1945, respondents deposited with one Harry E. Clem, a real estate broker, $250 as an initial payment and agreed to purchase certain realty owned by appellant for the sum of $7,500; payable $1,250 in cash and the balance by deed of trust and note for $6,000. Thereafter certain events occurred which are hereinafter recited' in chronological order:

1945

Oct. 8: Written escrow instructions, containing a limitation of time of 30 days, were executed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shreeves v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Todd v. VestermarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. People v. PughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Domino v. MobleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co. v. 1616 Reminc Ltd. Partnership (In Re 1616 Reminc Ltd. Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
  5. Fogarty v. SaathoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API