Watts v. Mohr
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
This is an appeal by defendant Anna Mohr from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs decreeing specific performance of an escrow agreement.
On October 5, 1945, respondents deposited with one Harry E. Clem, a real estate broker, $250 as an initial payment and agreed to purchase certain realty owned by appellant for the sum of $7,500; payable $1,250 in cash and the balance by deed of trust and note for $6,000. Thereafter certain events occurred which are hereinafter recited' in chronological order:
1945
Oct. 8: Written escrow instructions, containing a limitation of time of 30 days, were executed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shreeves v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by10 opinions
- Todd v. VestermarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. PughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Domino v. MobleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co. v. 1616 Reminc Ltd. Partnership (In Re 1616 Reminc Ltd. Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
- Fogarty v. SaathoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.