State v. Milk
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMiller, Justice
I dissent as to the majority’s conclusion that hearsay evidence is not admissible at a juvenile transfer hearing.
Juvenile dispositional proceedings are fundamentally different from juvenile adjudicatory proceedings and criminal actions. A transfer hearing does not result in a determination of delinquency, it does not result in a determination-of guilt, and it does not result in confinement or other punishment. The purpose of the transfer hearing is not to *319adjudicate but to determine whether retention of the child in the juvenile system is in the best interests of the child and the public. I…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. Chi Ko WongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.