Ehrman v. Kaufman, Vidal, Hileman & Ramlow, PC
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wheat
¶1 The Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, granted summary judgment to Kaufman, Vidal, Hileman & Ramlow, P.C (‘KVHR”), concluding that Robert Ehrman’s (Ehrman) legal malpractice claim against KVHR was barred by the three year statute of limitations.
¶2 We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent witl this Opinion.
BACKGROUND
¶3 In January 2002, Ehrman sought legal advice from KVH regarding whether he could acquire William L. Baillie’s (Baillie) bo dock rights located on Bigfork Harbor on Flathead Lake. The questioi] Ehrman presented to KVHR was one of contract…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Stockton v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Merzlak v. PurcellMontana Supreme Court · 1992
- Johnson v. BarrettMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Estate of Watkins v. Hedman, Hileman & LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Belanus v. PotterMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- Belanus v. QuintanaMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- Kingman v. WeightmanMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- Christian v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
- Christian v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.