Legal Opinion

Wanner v. Alsup

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 22, 1965No. 111PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenNy, C.J.

The appellant assigns as error the ruling of the court below in granting the defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, on the ground that such evidence established the contributory negligence of plaintiff’s testatrix as a matter of law.

The real question for determination is whether or not the plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to carry the case to the jury on the issues of negligence, contributory negligence, last clear chance, and damages, which issues were raised by the pleadings.

The mere fact that plaintiff’s testatrix attempted to cross Valley…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Tysinger v. Coble Dairy ProductsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Blake v. MallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Citizens National Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Williams v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Exum v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Earle v. WyrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Vancamp v. BurgnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Artis v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Herring v. ScottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API