Herring v. Scott
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
The defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial court to grant a mistrial rather than just striking the speed testimony of the plaintiff’s brother. Any error of the trial court was cured by the striking of the evidence and by the judge’s instruction that the jury should disregard that testimony. Wands v. Cauble, 270 N.C. 311, 154 S.E. 2d 425 (1967) ; Smith v. Perdue, 258 N.C. 686, 129 S.E. 2d 293 (1963). See also Stansbury’s North Carolina Evidence (Brandis Revision, 1973) § 28.
The defendant also assigns as error the failure of the trial court to strike the testimony…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. BagwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Jones v. . BagwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Smith v. PerdueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Ray v. French Broad Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Wanner v. AlsupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Auman v. EasterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974