Legal Opinion

In Re Cardinal Health, Inc. Securities Litigation

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 5, 2008No. 1:04-cv-00575PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Objectors to a class-action settlement move for attorneys’ fees. Cardinal Health, Inc. (“Cardinal”) settled a securities class action with its shareholders for $600 million. Lead counsel requested 24% of the settlement. The Court awarded 18%, or $108 million. Now, a number of class members who objected to lead counsel’s request demand attorneys’ fees between $3.7 and $6.6 million. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES these motions.

II. BACKGROUND

Lead Plaintiff, the Pension Fund Group 1 (“PFG”), brought a class action…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Bowling v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Frankenstein v. McCrory Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  5. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lonardo v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  2. In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
  3. In Re Unitedhealth Group Inc. Pslra LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  4. The Shane Group, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API