Legal Opinion
Animal Science Products, Inc. v. China Minmetals Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 17, 2011No. 10-2288PublishedCited by 196 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHAGARES, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Animal Science Products, Inc. and Resco Products, Inc. appeal the District Court’s dismissal of their First Amended Complaint, in part without prejudice, on the basis that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act of 1982 (the “FTAIA”), 15 U.S.C. § 6a. For the reasons that follow, we will vacate and remand.
I
The plaintiffs are domestic purchasers of “magnesite.” 1 The plaintiffs allege, on behalf of a putative class, that the defendants — Chinese producers and exporters of magnesite — engaged in a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by196 opinions
- Ethypharm S.A. France v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Lotes Co. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Minn-Chem, Incorpora v. Agrium IncoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Albert Flora, Jr. v. County of LuzerneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- S.R.P. Ex Rel. Abunabba v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
191 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.