Legal Opinion

Gage v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Writ of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Frank Scales, Judge, presiding. This is a special assessment proceeding to pay the cost of a connected system of sewers in the city of Chicago.

Read the full summary

Writ of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Frank Scales, Judge, presiding. This is a special assessment proceeding to pay the cost of a connected system of sewers in the city of Chicago. The ordinance,' providing for such connected system of sewers, was passed by the city council on November 2,1891. Petition was filed in the county court of Cook county on November 25,1891, to which was attached a certified copy of the ordinance, alleging that the commissioners, appointed by the common council to make an estimate of the cost of the improvement contemplated by the ordinance,…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

Among the objections, made to the confirmation of the assessment by plaintiff in error in the county court, was the objection that the ordinance, lying at the basis of the assessment, was void for uncertainty. The following diagram shows the situation and aspect of the proposed sewers, and the streets, through which they were to run:

Douglas Park Boulevard.

[[Image here]]

Section 1 of the ordinance provides,, “that a connected system of vitrified tile-pipe sewers be constructed as follows, to-wit: In West Sixteenth street along" the center line thereof from and connecting with the sewer in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nevins v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Bickerdike v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. City of Alton v. Middleton's HeirsIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hayne v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Maben v. OlsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  3. Vandersyde v. People ex rel. RaymondIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. City of North Chicago v. CummingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Amended April 11, 2017 Board of Water Works Trustees of the City of Des Moines, Iowa v. Sac County Board of Supervisors, as Trustee of Drainage Districts 32, 42, 65, 79, 81, 83, 86, and Calhoun County Board of Supervisors and Sac County Board of Supervisors as Joint Trustees of Drainage Districts 2 and 51 and Buena Vista County Board of Supervisors and Sac County Board of Supervisors as Joint TrusteesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API