Legal Opinion · Dissent

Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Texas v. Wildish Construction Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1988No. TC 82-4537-J-2) (CA A37930) (SC S33913, S34064Published

1DissentGillette, J.

The court today throws away an opportunity to take a step presaged in its opinions of the last 30 years. Because I believe we should take that step, I dissent.

As early as 1959, this court said that, in cases of tortious damage to real property,

“[because] the allowance of damages is to award just compensation without enrichment, there is no universal test for determining the value of property injured or destroyed and * * * the mode and amount of proof must be adapted to the facts of each case. [Citation omitted.]”

Ore. Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Mathis, 215 Or 218, 224-25, 334 P2d 186 (1959)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Peavey Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Oregon Mutual Fire Insurance v. MathisOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Hanset v. General Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API