Legal Opinion

Lane v. Cape Mutual Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 17, 1984No. 47963PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Presiding Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal concerning a judgment for $15,000 entered on a jury verdict on respondents’ (insureds) claim for wind damage to a farm building insured against damage by windstorm. Appellant (insurance company) appeals that judgment and insureds appeal from the order granting insurance company a new trial on the ground the trial court erred in failing to define the term “fair market value.” The cause is remanded for a new trial to be limited to the issue of damages only.

*645Insurance company asserts there was insufficient evidence from which the jury could…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bandag of Springfield, Inc. v. Bandag, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Berry v. Federal Kemper Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Sall v. EllfeldtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Franklin v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Floyd v. BrennerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holtmeier v. DayaniMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Titsworth v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Lipton Realty, Inc. v. St. Louis Housing AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Roark Motor Lodge Interval Sales Corp. v. LindnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Grippe v. MomtazeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API