Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ctia - the Wireless Ass'n v. City of Berkeley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 21, 2017No. 16-15141Published

1DissentFriedland, Circuit Judge

The majority interprets the sentences in Berkeley’s forced disclosure statement one at a time and holds that each is “literally true.” But consumers would not read those sentences in isolation the way the majority does. Taken as a whole, the most natural reading of the disclosure warns that carrying a cell phone in one’s pocket is unsafe. Yet Berkeley has not attempted to argue, let alone to prove, that message is true.

It is clear that the First Amendment prevents the government from requiring businesses to make false or misleading statements about their own products. See Video Software…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Klein v. City of San ClementeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Video Software Dealers Association v. SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API