Legal Opinion

Hamernick v. Essex Dodge Ltd.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1995No. S-93-399PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanphier, J.

The plaintiff-appellant, Iva Mae Hamernick, brought this suit against The Lund Company and Essex Dodge Ltd. for personal injuries sustained after slipping and falling in the lobby of a building maintained by Lund and owned by Essex, who are the defendants-appellees. After the jury returned a verdict for the defendants, Hamernick moved for a new trial. The district court for Douglas County overruled her motion for a new trial, and Hamernick appeals from that ruling. Hamernick contends that the jury was improperly instructed. The instruction complained of stated that if the evidence showed that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carnes v. WeesnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tichenor v. LohausNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Sindelar v. Canada Transport, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Corbin v. Mann's International Meat Specialties, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Nebraska Depository Institution Guaranty Corp. v. StastnyNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sacco v. CarothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tapp v. Blackmore Ranch, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic MarkingNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Sedlak Aerial Spray, Ltd. v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. LoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API