Legal Opinion

Miller v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 19, 1982No. 66-75PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLAIANNI, Judge:

Plaintiff in this case has alleged a “taking” by the Government of a flowage and underflowage easement on farm property riparian to the Arkansas River in Perry County, Arkansas. Plaintiff’s complaint is that his land suffers increased flooding and duration of flooding as a result of the operation of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. He further maintains that the project has raised the ground water table under his land and that he is consequently unable to machine farm parts of the land.

A trial was held on the issue of liability and I concluded that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SponenbargerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Bonelli Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Edward M. Crough, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Allen (Walter) v. u.s.allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Schuster (William T.) v. u.s.schuster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Staskus (John) v. u.s.staskus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Berenholz (Gustav) v. u.s.berenholz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API