Legal Opinion
Louver Drape, Inc. v. Orr
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 30, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 4686Published
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, District Judge.
The crux of this action is the scope of a license agreement.
By stipulation the parties have agreed that the case be tried under Rule 42(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure — the trial being limited to those issues raised by the complaint and Paragraph 10 of defendants’ answer and counterclaim, seeking a declaration from the Court as to the extent and scope of the license agreement heretofore granted plaintiff, and precisely, whether said license is limited to claim 5 of the patent, as asserted by defendants, or extends to claims 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, as asserted by plaintiff.
O…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Minerals Separation North American Corp. v. Magma Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Baldwin Rubber Co. v. Paine & Williams Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Anthony Company and the Heil Company v. The Perfection Steel Body CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- In re KnowlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.