Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. v. Hamilton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Saxe, J.
The law firm Pepper Hamilton and one of its members, W. Roderick Gagné, were deprived of millions of dollars in professional liability insurance coverage purchased by the firm, by the order of the motion court declaring that the three excess insurance carriers have no obligation to indemnify the firm. The court reasoned that because the law firm knew of misconduct on the part of its client, and of the likelihood that claims would be made against the firm itself based upon its representation of that client while the misconduct took place, it had an obligation to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Belt Painting Corp. v. TIG InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- William Selko v. Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Coregis Insurance Company v. Baratta & Fenerty, Ltd Anthony Baratta, Esq. Kenneth Lee Danielle Lee Baratta & Fenerty, Ltd Anthony Baratta, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Jeffrey Justofin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Board of Public Education v. WatsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The North River Insurance Company v. LeiferDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022