Morris v. Texas & N. O. R.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing
Concerning Ground IX: — The plaintiff was familiar with the procedure followed by the members of the crew in making a coupling such as that involved in this suit, and with the duties of the members of the crew who were to perform this procedure. The procedure is described in our original opinion; it consisted of the operation of the locomotive and the movement of the attached cars by the engineer at the signal of, and in accordance with the signal of the brakeman. Procedure and duties were fixed, definite and certain and evidently were established before the coupling…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.