Legal Opinion

George v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1998No. 21863PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Following jury trial, Movant was convicted of one count of rape and five counts of sodomy. Following judgment entered in accordance with the verdict and sentencing, he appealed. Movant also filed a Rule 29.15 motion, seeking to vacate the judgment and sentences. Initially, that motion was denied without an evidentiary hearing. Movant appealed from that denial, and the appeals were consolidated. Movant’s direct appeal from the criminal convictions was affirmed but the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion was reversed and the cause “remanded for an evidentiary hearing only on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. State v. StepterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. McClellan v. Board of Regents of the State UniversityTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. BoydMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State v. StephanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kluck v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Kates v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Vann v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. White v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Clark v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API