Legal Opinion

Broyhill v. Aycock & Spence

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1991No. 901SC552Published

1Opinion of the Court

402 S.E.2d 167 (1991)

Ray R. BROYHILL

v.

AYCOCK & SPENCE, A North Carolina Partnership; and W. Mark Spence, Individually.

No. 901SC552.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 2, 1991.

Jeffrey L. Miller, Greenville, for plaintiff-appellant.

Hornthal, Riley, Ellis & Maland by M.H. Hood Ellis, Elizabeth City, for defendant-appellees.

GREENE, Judge.

Plaintiff, Ray R. Broyhill, filed a complaint alleging attorney malpractice against defendant law partnership, Aycock & Spence, and against defendant, W. Mark Spence, on 10 May 1988. Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment allowed for defendants on 29…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. United Leasing Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. North Carolina State Bar v. SheffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. North Carolina State Bar v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Vernon, Vernon, Wooten, Brown & Andrews, P. A. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API