Broyhill v. Aycock & Spence
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
402 S.E.2d 167 (1991)
Ray R. BROYHILL
v.
AYCOCK & SPENCE, A North Carolina Partnership; and W. Mark Spence, Individually.
No. 901SC552.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
April 2, 1991.
Jeffrey L. Miller, Greenville, for plaintiff-appellant.
Hornthal, Riley, Ellis & Maland by M.H. Hood Ellis, Elizabeth City, for defendant-appellees.
GREENE, Judge.
Plaintiff, Ray R. Broyhill, filed a complaint alleging attorney malpractice against defendant law partnership, Aycock & Spence, and against defendant, W. Mark Spence, on 10 May 1988. Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment allowed for defendants on 29…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- United Leasing Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- North Carolina State Bar v. SheffieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- North Carolina State Bar v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Vernon, Vernon, Wooten, Brown & Andrews, P. A. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.