Legal Opinion
Amato v. City of Richmond
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided December 15, 1994No. Civ. A. 3:94cv193PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAYNE, District Judge.
Anthony M. Amato, a professional informant, and A. Michael Scott, a police officer employed by the Richmond Police Department, each instituted actions against the City, its Chief of Police and several police officers. The Chief of Police and the officers are named in their individual and official capacities. The actions were consolidated for discovery and trial because they involve some common issues of fact and law.
In Count I of their respective complaints, Scott and Amato seek recovery, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Major Miller, Captain Gooch, and…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Valance v. Gaylon Wisel, Mike Reneau, Ed PearceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Hinton v. Virginia Union UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Cain v. COM. OF VIRGINIADistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- Daniczek v. SpencerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Rhodes v. SmithersDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.