Russell v. Russell
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentGonzalez, Justice
In 1989 the legislature repealed the Family Code provision which provided that an agreement to enter into a common-law marriage could be inferred if one of the parties proved that they lived together as husband and wife and represented to others that they were married. Today, the Court ignores this amendment and in effect holds *935that a fact finder can look to cohabitation and holding-out as circumstantial evidence of an agreement to be married. This approach is identical to the process of inferences that the legislature repealed. Under our constitution, the legislature is authorized to make…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cameron v. Terrell & Garrett, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. $11,014.00Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Allen Sales & Servicenter, Inc. v. RyanTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MaksynTexas Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.