Legal Opinion

Smith v. Town of Hudson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 16, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

Three questions are argued: 1. Whether there was sufficient evidence of defendant’s negligenee. 2. WTiether the plaintiff was, as matter of law, guilty of contributory negligence. 3. Failure to instruct on the law of the road.

I. The sufficiency of the evidence of defendant’s negligence to go to the jury is not seriously argued. The accident occurred about 9 o’clock, Sunday evening, October 29, 1922. About two days before, a ditcb for a water-pipe connection had been dug from the west side to the center of Main Street in defendant town about the middle of the block between Third and Fourth…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. KinnanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. Riepe v. EltingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  3. Baker v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Fox v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  5. McElhinney v. KnittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. France v. BenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Dakovich v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  4. Dickeson v. LzicarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. France v. BenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API