Legal Opinion

Blankinship v. Porter

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1935No. 32,275PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This is an action to recover damages from the defendant on account of alleged fraud and deceit practiced upon the plaintiff by the defendant and alleged false representations, and promises made by defendant to plaintiff, which defendant, it is alleged, never intended to perform, whereby defendant procured from plaintiff, relying thereon, title to an improved plantation of 1,407 acres in the state of Arkansas for an inadequate amount of money advanced in the nature of a loan.

The answer of the defendant was a general and special denial of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dill v. PopeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Handrub v. GriffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Kirk v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Kritzer v. MoffatWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Kiser v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Greensburg Production Credit Ass'n v. BucknerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Jackson v. National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Denning v. DenningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. Vining v. LedgerwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API