Legal Opinion

Stanley v. C & R Asphalt, LLC

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 8, 2013No. 2012-CA-001025-MRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING

ACREE, Chief Judge:

We are asked to consider whether Jeremy Stanley’s appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction because it was filed more than thirty days after entry of the circuit court’s judgment and following a pro forma CR1 59.05 motion. In accordance with Matthews v. Viking Energy Holdings, LLC, we sustain the appellee’s motion. 341 S.W.3d 594 (Ky.App.2011).

Judgment was entered in favor of C & R Asphalt, LLC on March 7, 2012. On March 16, 2012, Stanley filed a motion entitled, “Motion to Alter, Amend[,] or Vacate” the judgment. The motion identified no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doe v. Golden & Walters, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
  2. Matthews v. VIKING ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joshua Banister v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2020
  2. Maclean v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API