Maclean v. Middleton
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTaylor, Judge
Respectfully, I concur in part and dissent in part. I concur with the majority opinion on those issues raised on appeal which were heard by the Family Court Judge and not delegated to the Master Commissioner. However, I must respectfully dissent to the majority’s decision on all issues raised on appeal that look to the recommendation of the Master Commissioner to the Family Court Judge — specifically the determination of appellee’s non-marital interest in various assets, including the distributions from “the Daughter’s Trust” and the nonmarital interest in the marital residence in conjunction…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rose v. Council for Better Education, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1989
- Bingham v. BinghamKentucky Supreme Court · 1982
- Abernathy v. NicholsonKentucky Supreme Court · 1995
- Stewart v. City of CorbinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Stanley v. C & R Asphalt, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013