Legal Opinion

Keaton v. R. Dakin & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 29, 1986No. 13-86-150-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in a suit on a sworn account. TEX.R.CIV.P. 166-A, and 185. Appellee initially brought suit against Robert Watson, individually and d/b/a Nita’s Hallmark, on a sworn account to recover $4,406.05 in merchandise sold to three Nita’s Hallmark stores. Watson filed a verified denial alleging he was not liable in the capacity in which he was sued; that he was not the owner of the three stores; and that he merely operated the stores on behalf of the real owner, Onieta Keaton. Watson subsequently filed bankruptcy proceedings…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rizk v. Financial Guardian Insurance Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Sundance Oil Co. v. Aztec Pipe and Supply Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Nichols v. William A. Taylor, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  5. Gibson v. John D. Campbell and Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hose Pro Connectors, Inc. v. Parker Hannifin Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Rocass L.L.C. D/B/A Rocass Homes v. Nancy Zazueta, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API