Keaton v. R. Dakin & Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in a suit on a sworn account. TEX.R.CIV.P. 166-A, and 185. Appellee initially brought suit against Robert Watson, individually and d/b/a Nita’s Hallmark, on a sworn account to recover $4,406.05 in merchandise sold to three Nita’s Hallmark stores. Watson filed a verified denial alleging he was not liable in the capacity in which he was sued; that he was not the owner of the three stores; and that he merely operated the stores on behalf of the real owner, Onieta Keaton. Watson subsequently filed bankruptcy proceedings…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Rizk v. Financial Guardian Insurance Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
- Sundance Oil Co. v. Aztec Pipe and Supply Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
- Nichols v. William A. Taylor, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
- Gibson v. John D. Campbell and Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hose Pro Connectors, Inc. v. Parker Hannifin Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Rocass L.L.C. D/B/A Rocass Homes v. Nancy Zazueta, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015