Legal Opinion

Allstates Trading & Clothing Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 8, 2006No. Court 04-00245Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

EATON, Judge:

This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT Rule 56(c) of plaintiff Allstates Trading & Clothing Co., Ltd. (“plaintiff” or “Allstates”) and defendant the United States. By its motion, plaintiff challenges the denial of its protest of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection’s (“Customs”) exclusion of 7,170 men’s polar fleece vests based on Customs’s determination that the documentation submitted to establish the country of origin of the subject merchandise was not authentic. See Pl.’s Mem. Supp. Mot. Summ. J. (“Pl.’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API