Pico v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated June 16, 2003, which denied the petition.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner failed to establish that the respondent had timely notice of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days of its accrual or a reasonable time thereafter. Assuming *288that the respondent had knowledge of the facts constituting the claim because New York City Correction Officers were present…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shapiro v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Seif v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Gilliam v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Termini v. Valley Stream Union Free School District No. 13Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Levette v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Felice v. Eastport/South Manor Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Valila v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- White v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Matter of Bramble v. New York City Dept. of Educ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Meyer v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.