Meyer v. County of Suffolk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*721“ ‘In exercising its discretion in determining whether or not to [deem a notice of claim timely served], the court must consider various factors, including whether (1) the claimant is an infant, (2) the claimant has demonstrated a reasonable excuse for failing to serve a timely notice of claim, (3) the public corporation acquired actual knowledge of the facts constituting the claim within 90 days of its accrual or a reasonable time thereafter, and (4) the delay would substantially prejudice the public corporation in defending on the merits (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [5])’ ” (Wade v New…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Williams v. Nassau County Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Felice v. Eastport/South Manor Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Rowe v. NYCPDAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Flores v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Destine v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Wright v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Bhargava v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Minkowicz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Hamilton v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.