Leddy v. RACCIO
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The defendant, Howard Raccio, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiff, Brian Leddy. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that it could ignore deposition testimony concerning uncharged misconduct involving the defendant and another person. The defendant claims that this misconduct evidence had an incurably prejudicial effect on the court’s consideration of the case. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The court reasonably could have found the following facts…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Viera v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. RomeroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. AntonarasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012