Legal Opinion
Connolly v. Burger King Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 14, 1997PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
Pursuant to leave granted, plaintiff: in this sexual harassment discrimination case appeals from a trial court order partially denying her motion for discovery. We now reverse and remand.
Plaintiff was employed as manager of a Burger King restaurant. Defendant Burger King Corporation (Burger King) is the franchisor, and defendant Dime-Mor, Inc. (Dime-Mor) is the franchisee. Defendant Ron Solon was employed by Burger King as a quality assurance inspector.
Plaintiff alleges that Solon began inspecting Dime-Mor’s restaurants in 1993 and that in the course of those inspections, “Solon repeatedly…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lehmann v. Toys 'R' US, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Payton v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Payton v. New Jersey Turnpike Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wilson v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Isetts v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- J.M.L. v. A.M.P.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- KS v. ABC Professional Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.