Legal Opinion
Samira Hazama v. Rex W. Tillerson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 20, 2017No. 15-2982PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Chief Judge.
In an effort to seek judicial review of a consular official’s unfavorable decision on a visa application, Samira' Hazama and Ahmed Abdel Hafiz Ghneim filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in- the district court for the Northern District of Illinois, where Hazama resides. The district court concluded that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the petition, because it thought that review was precluded under the Supreme Court’s decisions in Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S. 753, 92 S.Ct. 2576, 33 L.Ed.2d 683 (1972), and Kerry v. Din, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2128, 192 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kerry v. DinSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Madeline Cardenas v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. VinyardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Esmeralda Morfin v. Rex W. TillersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Matushkina v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Moshin Yafai v. Mike PompeoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Kerr v. PolisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Melody Pak v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Gary KovallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.