Legal Opinion
2641 Concourse Co. v. City University
New York Court of Claims
Decided April 22, 1987No. Claim No. 68716PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard M. Weisberg, J.
On this motion we must determine whether a nonparty’s guilty plea is admissible in a civil action under the declaration against interest exception to the hearsay rule.
Claimant, a partnership known as 2641 Concourse Co., seeks compensation for the use and occupancy of its building by *465Herbert H. Lehman College, a four-year senior college of the defendant, City University of New York. As part of its proof in establishing the fair rental value of the demised premises, and over defendant’s objection, a substitute resolution of the New York City Board of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- S. T. Grand, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ellis v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- 2641 Concourse Co. v. City University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- 2641 Concourse Co. v. City University of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1987
- Borden v. Capital District Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Borden v. Capital District Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003