Legal Opinion

United States v. Peters

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided August 12, 1981No. NMCM 80 0640PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOHLEN, Judge:

Appellant was found guilty in accordance with his pleas of an unauthorized absence *876of approximately 30 days and possession of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), violations of Articles 86 and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 892, respectively, and sentenced by a special court-martial composed of officer members to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for six months and reduction to pay grade E-l. The convening and supervisory authorities approved the adjudged sentence.

On appeal appellant contends, among other things, that his plea to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HigaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. LewisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. MallettU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API