Williams v. Flinn & Treacy
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Franklin A. Griffin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This action was brought by plaintiff to recover commissions alleged to have been due to him from defendants, who were contractors for street work, as compensation for soliciting from owners of real property contracts to do street work.
Plaintiff recovered judgment for $1,583.18 and the defendants have appealed. The first problem to be met has reference to the sufficiency of the record presented by the appellants, respondent vigorously objecting to a consideration of the points'urged by appellants, upon the ground that said points are not presented by properly authenticated bills of exceptions.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Keyes v. NimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Haun v. RosenmayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Lincoln v. SibeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chesapeake Industries, Inc. v. Togova Entreprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Continental Rubber Works v. BernsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Ross v. McDougalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- San Diego Fruit & Produce Co. v. ElsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.