Port Huron & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Callanan
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from St. Clair. (Stevens, J.) Bill filed to set aside an award. Complainant appeals from a decree dismissing bill. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
The bill in this case was filed to sot aside an award of compensation for lands over which complainant laid its track. Defendant owned a parcel of land *25at the corner of a street running east and west, in the plat of Fort Gratiot, which lies above Port Huron, and of another street running north and south, which is the one used for the railway. Proceedings had been taken to condemn the land, which were set aside as illegal, and other litigation had arisen and was pending. On the eighteenth day of May, 1886, a jury had been impaneled in an action for damages brought by defendant against…
2Cited by22 opinions
- Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. GavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. KwaiserMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Howe v. Patrons' Mutual Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Stemmer v. Scottish InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. SpaffordMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.