Legal Opinion

Botner v. Botner

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1996No. Civil 950268Published

1Opinion of the Court

545 N.W.2d 188 (1996)

Corey BOTNER, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

William BOTNER, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Rosalie BOTNER, Third-Party Defendant.

Civil No. 950268.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

March 19, 1996.

Lynn Anderson Kerbeshian (argued), Grand Forks, for plaintiff and appellee. Appearance by Corey Botner.

Neil W. Fleming (argued), Fleming, DuBois, Trenbeath & Einarson, Cavalier, for defendant, third-party plaintiff and appellant.

NEUMANN, Justice.

William Botner appealed from a judgment requiring him to pay college expenses for his son, Corey Botner, under a 1978 divorce…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Walle; Concurrence · Sandstrom.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. QuistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hummel v. Mid Dakota Clinic, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Eberhart v. EberhartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Botner v. BotnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Anderson v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API