Crittenden v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
Appellant pled nolo contendere to a charge of possession of controlled substance (heroin), and was sentenced in accordance with a plea bargain to seven years, probated. His conviction was affirmed by the Third Court of Appeals. Crittenden v. State, No. 91-2720 (Tex.App.—Austin, April 14, 1993) (unpublished). We granted discretionary review on a single ground, viz: “Did the court of appeals err in holding that the stop of appellant’s vehicle, and his subsequent detention, was not a ‘pretext arrest’ under the provisions of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- United States v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-LazoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Lyon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- McCullough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- State v. DixonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Oles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Haley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Powell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- Goodwin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.