City of Detroit v. Proctor
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Carey, J.:
The important question to be decided is whether an action may be brought in Delaware to enforce the revenue laws of another State or political • subdivision thereof. It is not alleged that a judgment was ever obtained in Michigan against the defendant for these taxes and this case is, therefore, not governed by the decision in Milwaukee County *196v. M. E. White Co., 296 U.S. 268, 56 S. Ct. 229, 80 L. Ed. 220, in which it was held that a judgment is not to be denied full faith and credit in State and Federal Courts merely because it is for taxes. In that case, the Supreme Court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- The AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pasquantino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Judah v. Delaware Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Mayor and Council of Wilmington v. DukesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- State of California v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.