Legal Opinion
Friedland v. Unum Group
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 19, 2014No. Civ. No. 13-1417-SLRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBINSON, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
On August 14, 2013, plaintiff Karen Friedland (“plaintiff’) filed a complaint against Unum Group (“Unum”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Unum Life Insurance Company of America (“Unum Life”) (collectively “defendants”), to challenge Unum Life’s denial of her claim for ongoing disability benefits under a long-term disability plan that is regulated by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (“ERISA”). (D.I. 1) Plaintiff asserts three causes of action: (1) claim for benefits under ERISA § 502(a)(1)(B);…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Anderson v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019