Adamson v. United Mine Workers of America
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WORTHEN, Justice.
The evidence considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff fails to show an agency relationship between defendant International Union of the United Mine Workers of America and the individuals who committed the alleged assault and battery and false imprisonment, for which plaintiff commenced this action.
The record shows that the action was originally filed in Salt Lake County to recover damages for the alleged torts which occurred during a labor dispute in Carbon County, Utah.
The defendant was named with no more specificity than the “United Mine Workers of America.”
A…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- Toledo, St. L. & W. R. v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Valiotis v. Utah-Apex Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
- Goddard v. Lexington Motor Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by2 opinions
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
- Telegraph Tower LLC v. Century Mortgage LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016