Legal Opinion

State v. Tickle

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 1, 1978No. 7821SC135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

Defendant contends that information from a previously unknown informant is not sufficient to constitute probable cause for a warrantless search of an automobile unless the informant also relates facts which show he is reliable and his information dependable. See Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed. 2d 723 (1964); State v. Gibson, 32 N.C. App. 584, 233 S.E. 2d 84 (1977); State v. Beddard, 35 N.C. App. 212, 241 S.E. 2d 83 (1978). We will assume for argument, without deciding, that the Aguilar standards apply in determining probable cause for a war-rantless search…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. SturkieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API