Wiersma v. Bank of the West (In re Wiersma)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
This memorandum disposition resolves the remaining issues in the Chapter 11 *605bankruptcy case of Jim and Patricia Wi-ersma (“Debtors”) following our published opinion on the jurisdictional issue in Wiersma v. Bank of the West (In re Wiersma), 483 F.3d 933 (9th Cir.2007).
Because Debtors’ appeal of the Secured Status Order was untimely, we lack jurisdiction to review the Order. We address Debtors’ remaining claims below and affirm the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”).
I. Mootness of the Settlement Agreement
Mootness is a jurisdictional issue stemming from the case-or-controversy…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- In the Matter of Pizza of Hawaii, Inc., Debtor. Pizza of Hawaii, Inc. v. Shakey's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In Re American Mariner Industries, Inc., Debtor. Crocker National Bank v. American Mariner Industries, Inc., Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Acequia, Inc., Debtor. Acequia, Inc. v. Vernon B. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Latman v. BurdetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Tci 2 Holdings, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Loop 76, LLC (In Re Loop 76, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Beal Bank USA v. Windmill Durango Office, LLC (In re Windmill Durango Office, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In re BellowsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 2016
- Beal Bank USA v. Windmill Durango Office, LLC (In Re Windmill Durango Office, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.