Legal Opinion

Whitman v. Whitman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 15, 1964No. 41237PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

Subsequent to the entry of a divorce decree and death of her former husband, the divorced wife instituted the instant proceeding to revive the divorce action against the executrix of the deceased husband’s estate. The manifest object of this proceeding was to maintain the order for child support in continuing force and vitality. The trial court revived the action, substituted the executrix of the deceased husband’s estate .as a party defendant therein, and ordered that the wife had “a cause of action as •stated in Creditor’s Claim for the projected “balance of child support to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Luckenbach v. LaerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Smith v. FunkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Love v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Shefts v. Oklahoma Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. In Re Smith's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Northrip v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Farmers Insurance Group v. Worth Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Turley v. Flag-Redfern Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Steincamp v. SteincampSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API