Image Technical Services, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CAULFIELD, District Judge;
Defendant Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) brings a motion to disqualify plaintiffs’ counsel, the Coudert Brothers Law Firm (“Coudert”). Upon consideration of the briefs and arguments of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, Kodak’s motion to disqualify the Coudert firm is GRANTED.
FACTS AND BACKGROUND
The Coudert firm has provided legal services to Eastman Chemical, one of Kodak’s three major operating divisions, for the last six years. These services have covered a vast array of legal matters, including competition law questions, joint ventures,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Western Continental Operating Co. v. Natural Gas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Tomlinson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Federal InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Visa U.S.A., Inc. v. First Data Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. J-M Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Lennar Mare Island, LLC v. Steadfast InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Healy v. Axelrod Construction Co. Defined Benefit Pension Plan & TrustDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.